muslimdata.in

Last updated 29 July 2026

Muslim literacy rate in India

Of people aged 7 and older, what share can read and write. The Census uses 7+ as the standard cutoff to exclude very young children.

68.6%can read and write, age 7+(2011)

higher is better

vs all communities: -4.4pp behind

Explore the interactive chart, with breakdowns by state, sex, and urban vs rural →

Latest figures by community (2011)

CommunityLatest value
Muslim68.6%
Hindu73.3%
Jain94.9%
Christian84.6%
Buddhist81.3%
Sikh75.4%
Other59.9%
All communities73.0%

By state35 states, 2011

State / UTMuslimHindu
Haryana53.4%77.1%
Meghalaya54.0%77.2%
Bihar56.4%62.9%
Nagaland57.9%80.0%
Uttar Pradesh58.8%69.7%
Jammu & Kashmir61.0%79.1%
Punjab61.9%80.1%
Assam61.9%77.7%
Rajasthan62.7%66.1%
Uttarakhand63.2%81.2%
Jharkhand66.2%67.7%
Himachal Pradesh67.5%83.1%
Arunachal Pradesh67.7%70.1%
Manipur67.8%82.0%
West Bengal68.8%79.1%
Andhra Pradesh73.6%66.1%
Chandigarh74.7%85.2%
Madhya Pradesh74.9%68.6%
NCT of Delhi75.6%87.3%
Sikkim76.6%82.0%
Mizoram77.8%91.8%
Karnataka78.9%74.4%
Odisha80.0%73.2%
Gujarat80.8%77.5%
Tripura83.2%88.2%
Maharashtra83.6%81.8%
Chhattisgarh84.6%69.8%
Goa84.7%88.7%
Daman & Diu85.9%87.1%
Dadra & Nagar Haveli86.6%75.6%
Tamil Nadu88.2%78.8%
Andaman & Nicobar Islands91.5%87.0%
Puducherry91.7%85.1%
Lakshadweep91.8%93.9%
Kerala93.3%93.5%

Computed Reproduce this view. This figure is computed from the linked published tables. Source: Census 2011 · C-series · Census 2001 · C-series. Each value is computed from the data file · transform code; every row records its own source and method.

By sex2011

CommunityMaleFemale
Muslim74.8%62.1%
Other70.9%49.1%
Hindu81.7%64.4%
Sikh80.0%70.3%
Buddhist88.3%74.1%
Christian87.7%81.5%
Jain96.8%92.9%
All communities80.9%64.7%

Computed Reproduce this view. This figure is computed from the linked published tables. Source: Census 2011 · C-series · Census 2001 · C-series. Each value is computed from the data file · transform code; every row records its own source and method.

Urban vs rural2011

CommunityUrbanRural
Muslim76.6%63.1%
Other79.7%57.8%
Hindu85.3%68.2%
Sikh86.5%70.9%
Buddhist87.3%76.7%
Christian92.9%78.7%
Jain96.5%88.6%
All communities84.2%67.8%

Computed Reproduce this view. This figure is computed from the linked published tables. Source: Census 2011 · C-series · Census 2001 · C-series. Each value is computed from the data file · transform code; every row records its own source and method.

Bottom line

Just under 69% of Muslims aged 7 and above could read and write in 2011, the lowest literacy rate among India's larger religious communities and about five points behind Hindus. The gap has been narrowing slowly since 2001, but literacy stays lowest for Muslim women and in rural areas, where barely three in five Muslims are literate.

How to read the chart

The main chart tracks literacy for each community across the 2001 and 2011 censuses, with Muslims in maroon and the all-India average as the dashed line; a rising line means literacy is improving. Because the distance between communities is the point, the vertical axis does not start at zero. The tabs break the same measure down further: By state shows how far the Muslim rate swings across India, By sex exposes the wide gap between Muslim men and women, and Urban vs rural shows how much lower literacy runs in Muslim villages than in Muslim towns.

Why it matters

Literacy is the floor every other opportunity stands on. It shapes access to formal jobs, government services and scholarships, and a household's ability to handle paperwork, health information and its own legal rights. A community that starts behind on literacy tends to stay behind on income, formal work and schooling in the generation that follows.

Status

Behindgap narrowing

Muslim 68.6% vs Hindu 73.3% in 2011, 4.7pp behind. The gap has closed by a little over a point since 2001, slow but steady progress, and literacy remains lowest for Muslim women and in rural areas.

Deeper analysis

Potential drivers

  • Poverty · Muslims are disproportionately poor and concentrated in informal urban work, so children are pulled toward earning rather than staying in school ↗ Sachar Committee Report, 2006.
  • School access · The Sachar Committee found too few schools in many Muslim-majority localities, leaving children further from a classroom ↗ Sachar Committee Report, 2006.
  • Early dropout · Muslims had the highest school dropout rate of any large community, most leaving around the move from primary to secondary ↗ Sachar Committee Report, 2006.
  • The female gap · Literacy is lowest of all for Muslim women, so half the community starts furthest behind, and a mother's literacy shapes the next generation.
  • Patchy delivery · The 2014 Post-Sachar review found remedial schemes existed on paper but reached Muslim children unevenly, so gaps persisted through weak delivery as much as missing policy ↗ Post-Sachar Evaluation Committee, 2014.

Key levers

  • Deliver existing aid · The Pre-Matric, Post-Matric and Merit-cum-Means scholarships already exist; the Post-Sachar priority is consistent delivery, not new schemes ↗ Post-Sachar Evaluation Committee, 2014.
  • Stop early dropout · Target the primary-to-secondary transition, where Muslim dropout is highest ↗ Sachar Committee Report, 2006.
  • Prioritise girls · Close the female literacy gap, the widest single sub-gap within the community.
  • Back minority schools · Protect and strengthen Article 30 minority institutions through the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions.
Key stakeholders

Badges link to an independent or registered credential where the organisation publishes one (Credibility Alliance, GiveIndia, 80G, FCRA). Many smaller NGOs do not take part in these registries, so a missing badge is not a mark against an organisation.

About this measurement

Definition. Share of population aged 7 and above who can both read and write with understanding in any language.

Methodology. Census defines literacy as the ability to read and write with understanding in any language. Two-census series (2001 and 2011, Census C-09 education-by-religion tables); both rounds share the same Census definition, so the 2001 -> 2011 change is a like-for-like comparison. PLFS reports a broadly similar literacy measure on a slightly different definition and is a possible future cross-check; no PLFS series is plotted here today.

Sources. Census 2011 · C-series · Census 2001 · C-series. Download CSV: lit-7plus.csv.

Computed How to reproduce. This figure is computed from the linked published tables.

Related indicators